Comments on: TwitCam brings Live Streaming to Twitter http://www.sporkings.com/2009/07/twitcam-brings-live-streaming-to-twitter/ Pretty Forking Excellent Thu, 23 Dec 2010 03:04:22 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3 By: CharlesWilson09http://www.sporkings.com/2009/07/twitcam-brings-live-streaming-to-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-165 CharlesWilson09 Thu, 17 Sep 2009 16:22:52 +0000 http://www.sporkings.com/?p=380#comment-165 where do i get more information on this<br><br><a href="http://www.playerauctions.com" rel="nofollow">warcraft gold sale</a><br><a href="http://www.washington-dui-lawyer.com" rel="nofollow">auburn dui penalties</a><br><a href="http://www.benaturalorganics.com" rel="nofollow">all natural skin care products</a> where do i get more information on this

warcraft gold sale
auburn dui penalties
all natural skin care products

]]> By: Livestream Blog » Blog Archive » Livestream launches Twitcam.comhttp://www.sporkings.com/2009/07/twitcam-brings-live-streaming-to-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-76 Livestream Blog » Blog Archive » Livestream launches Twitcam.com Wed, 22 Jul 2009 09:59:30 +0000 http://www.sporkings.com/?p=380#comment-76 [...] - Twitcam Beats CamTweet To Live Video Tweets - Mashable : TwitCam: Live Video Arrives on Twitter - Twitcam brings Live Streaming to Twitter - Paidcontent : How Livestream Upstaged Justin.tv With Its New Video Streaming Service on [...] [...] – Twitcam Beats CamTweet To Live Video Tweets – Mashable : TwitCam: Live Video Arrives on Twitter – Twitcam brings Live Streaming to Twitter – Paidcontent : How Livestream Upstaged Justin.tv With Its New Video Streaming Service on [...]

]]> By: Rukhttp://www.sporkings.com/2009/07/twitcam-brings-live-streaming-to-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-74 Ruk Tue, 21 Jul 2009 14:03:28 +0000 http://www.sporkings.com/?p=380#comment-74 I completely agree. the old private beta > beta > invite only way is outdated. firstly with private beta it's easy if you're close to the project to miss things. secondly with beta/invite only, people usually just invite their friends and they just say how wonderful the project is with hardly any constructive feedback, I think it's better to release something straight away and then when it breaks fix it, sure you still need to have a high level of testing before release, but why bother sending it to techchrunch to review first if it's not ready... I do wonder how much camtweet spent on their project and how much twitcam spent on theirs. I completely agree. the old private beta > beta > invite only way is outdated. firstly with private beta it's easy if you're close to the project to miss things. secondly with beta/invite only, people usually just invite their friends and they just say how wonderful the project is with hardly any constructive feedback, I think it's better to release something straight away and then when it breaks fix it, sure you still need to have a high level of testing before release, but why bother sending it to techchrunch to review first if it's not ready… I do wonder how much camtweet spent on their project and how much twitcam spent on theirs.

]]>